Washington Bureau

McCain, Obama similar on immigration reform, but paths differ


August 01 2008 | text size: small medium large
Email a FriendEmail to a Friend
Printer Friendly
Stumble It!
Digg!
Related
The Hispanic vote and immigration

On the issues: Immigration

Take the quiz

Most Popular Stories
BY AMY DOMINELLO
Media General News Service

WASHINGTON –John McCain and Barack Obama don’t agree on much, but they come close on immigration.

The two presidential candidates think the country’s immigration system needs reform.

Both believe America’s borders need to be secured.

They want to create a path to citizenship for the estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants in the country.

Both want to crack down on employers who hire undocumented immigrants.

And they want all immigrants to learn English.

But neither as president will be able to escape the politics of the debate. Political tensions likely will affect the way each would implement reform. Here’s a look at what we can expect on immigration from a McCain or an Obama administration.

Reforming a broken system
The two candidates, along with advocates on all sides of the issue, believe the next president will have no choice but to deal with immigration.

McCain, a Republican, came under fire from many hard-liners in his own party as the immigration debate heated up in 2006 and 2007 for his attempt to push through bipartisan reform legislation.

McCain and Democrat Obama both voted for the reform legislation in 2006, although the bill never made it out of Congress. The bill, among other things, would have built a fence along the Mexican border and allowed illegal immigrants to become citizens if they followed certain guidelines.

Supporters of a get-tough approach on illegal immigration hammered McCain for what they saw as rewarding people who entered the country illegally. Since then, McCain has backed away from his own proposals and now says he underestimated Americans’ desire to secure its borders first and then enact reform later.

“We must first prove to [Americans] that we can and will secure our borders first, while respecting the dignity and rights of citizens and legal residents of the United States,” McCain said in June. “But we must not make the mistake of thinking that our responsibility to meet this challenge will end with that accomplishment.”

His emphasis on border security and enforcement highlights his change on the issue. McCain believes additional reforms would come later. Obama is pushing for a comprehensive fix.

“We need immigration reform that will secure our borders, and punish employers who exploit immigrant labor - reform that finally brings the 12 million people who are here illegally out of the shadows by requiring them to take steps to become legal citizens,” Obama said in June. “We must assert our values and reconcile our principles as a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws.”

The difference in the candidates’ approach to reform is important, said Clarissa Martinez, director of immigration and national campaigns for the non-partisan civil rights group the National Council of La Raza.

A piecemeal approach will not work, she said.

“Dealing with border alone will not really deal with the restoration of law,” Martinez said.

Immigrants already here
Key to both candidates’ plans is how to deal with 12 million illegal immigrants already in the country. Neither believes it is practical to deport all illegal immigrants.

Obama supports allowing undocumented immigrants who are in good standing to pay a fine, learn English and go to the back of the line to become citizens.

In the meantime, Obama sees allowing illegal immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses as a practical solution to documenting those here illegally.

McCain as president would require all undocumented immigrants to enroll in a program to resolve their status. Under his proposal, background checks would be performed and immigrants would have to pay taxes they owe. Those who want to apply for citizenship would also have to go to the back of the line, behind those who have applied legally.

To cut down on illegal immigration, both support building a fence along the border with Mexico.

Obama calls for additional personnel, infrastructure and technology at the country’s borders and ports – and so does McCain, who also says he will work with governors to certify that borders are secure as well as provide additional funding to border states.

Employers
Both candidates want to develop employment verification systems.

Obama has pushed proposals to create a system for employers to verify workers are legally eligible to work in the United States.

McCain is also pushing for a similar system and has said the Department of Homeland Security would vigorously prosecute employers that continue to hire illegal immigrants.

Both would also create registries or databases of temporary workers.

Can change happen?

But the next president, whoever it is, will need to balance what sometimes are competing interests to be successful in reforming the current system, analysts say.

The issue is not one that divides clearly along party lines, so McCain or Obama will have to consider his supporters and tread carefully, said Angela Kelley, director of the Immigration Policy Center, a pro-immigrant research and policy group.

Labor unions, backing Obama, are highly interested in how immigration reform will affect the workers they represent, she said. Obama will also need to balance not alienating Hispanic voters, expected to be in his column in November.

McCain will have to balance the interests of the business community, traditionally a Republican base, as well as those in the party who take a hard line on illegal immigration, Kelley said.

Reform will also depend on Congress.

“I have a feeling that there are a lot of folks in Congress that don’t want to go down that path,” said Ira Mehlman, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which seeks to stop illegal immigration and reduce immigration overall.

Other issues, such as the economy and war in Iraq, are likely to occupy the new president’s attention before immigration, Kelley said.

“I think the issue is a necessity for the next president,” she said. “It’s just an issue of when it’s going to be called.”

Contact Amy Dominello at 202-662-7671 or adominello@mediageneral.com

Comments
"Notably, the European Union recently proposed a ``Blue Card'' program, similar to the U.S. H-1B visa program, under which skilled workers would be able to obtain a temporary work visa for employment in the European Union. If the Blue Card proposal is adopted, U.S. employers could be at a competitive disadvantage to employers in the European Union when recruiting foreign national candidates. U.S. high-tech employers are particularly concerned about the H-1B cap because of the critical shortage of domestic science and engineering talent and the degree to which high-tech employers are as a consequence necessarily far more dependent on foreign workers than other industries."

Wow, more propaganda from the Tech industry to get more Foreign Workers whom will work for less. Great Idea!

Again, sending the message to our American Youth not to waste their college years learning anything High tech, because the Industry is full of Liberals just like you.

I want America to grow by American Hands and Minds,which mean forcing American companies to stop hiring cheaper Foreign labor.

But not you Joe, which means your an Anti-American Citizen or Foreign national who is benefiting from these types pf programs.

So, which is it Joe are you a traitor to the American worker or a Foreigner?
Posted by HernandezUSA on 08/04/08
Hi HernandezUSA
We are loosing our edge on technology day by day. If you think there are sufficient good engineers then please help the industry. I can bet on we don't have sufficient highly skilled engineers and those immigrants who worked in US for few years because of USCIS inefficiency are leaving for canada or trying to apply for blue card.
Please research on the technical industry before making a statement.
Thanks.
Posted by Joe on 08/02/08
Joe are you on Liberal Crack?

You want H1B visa?

You want employers to have more excuses why they cant' hire an Highly Skilled American Citizens? For lower paid far less skilled Foreign Workers?

There are many US Citizens who have a hard time finding work in the High Tech fields because of people just like you!

H1B Visa is just Legal outsourcing of American Jobs on US soil and destroying our edge over the rest of the world.

Could possible be any more Anti-American and traitorous to the American People?

Not, to mention Insulting our youth whom you are telling to leave places like MIT and give up any chance of get a Highly skilled job, because people like you don't want Americans working!

Joe, please leave your Citizenship at the Border and go join a communist Country.
Posted by HernandezUSA on 08/02/08
I don't believe in the above post from HernandezUSA on 08/01/08

Rep Lofgren had fought against the inefficiency of USCIS and allowed hundreds and thousands of legal immigrants who are waiting for their green card to move faster. Jobs are not taken away because those legal immigrants are at present in the states for years. They are Highly skilled legal immigrants working on employment based visas (H1B). These immigrants have made jobs for americian people one of the examples is silicon valley, north california.

We need more Highly skilled legal immigrants to come in this country and create job opporunities.

Please thank our senate for helping us.
Posted by Joe on 08/02/08
Amy said: "The difference in the candidates’ approach to reform is important, said Clarissa Martinez, director of immigration and national campaigns for the non-partisan civil rights group the National Council of La Raza."

La Raza is non partisan? Give me a break!
Posted by kwg1 on 08/02/08
'Worst' Job Reports from Feds Today, But Sen. Menendez and Rep. Lofgren Fight for Hundreds of Thousands More Foreign Workers

The U.S. Department of Labor today announced some of the worst stats on the fate of American workers in years while Sen. Menendez of New Jersey and Rep. Lofgren of California fought to import hundreds of thousands of additional foreign workers. This morning, Rep. Lofgren shoved her foreign worker bill through the House immigration panel, not allowing amendments to protect American workers; Sen. Menendez last night introduced his bill for 550,000 more foreign workers while continuing to hold hostage a bill to re-authorize the E-Verify system to keep illegal foreign workers from taking Americans' jobs.

Why would any politician possibly think it is good politics to increase foreign labor importation over its already unprecedented high level at the same time that the Labor Department was announcing:

* Nonfarm payrolls fell for the 7th straight month.
* Since December, 463,000 American jobs have been lost.
* The official unemployment rate now stands at a four-year high.
* The average work week for Americans is now down to 33.6 hours -- an all-time low.

What insanity could cause the Senate to allow Sen. Menendez to hold up E-Verify authorization because he wants to bring in 550,000 more permanent foreign workers?

Rep. Lofgren has a history of callous behavior toward American workers, but her actions this morning put her on some kind of Olympic level for insensitivity.

If anybody ever doubted that the immigration issue causes a lot of leaders and elites to suffer from a form of mental illness, today should make believers of us all!



The phone number for the Senate switchboard is 202-224-3121 and the phone number for the House switchboard is 202-225-3121.
Posted by HernandezUSA on 08/01/08
Post a Comment

Registration Required

MGWashington.com requires that you be logged in in order to post comments. Please log in or register to leave your comment.

-- Advertisement --